Advanced Search

Journal Navigation

Journal Home

Subscriptions

Archive

Contact Us

Table of Contents

Sign In to gain access to subscriptions and/or personal tools.
European Journal of Archaeology
This Article
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow References
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Right arrow Citation Map
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Add to Saved Citations
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrowRequest Permissions
Right arrow Request Reprints
Right arrow Add to My Marked Citations
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Right arrow Citing Articles via Scopus
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Knapp, A. B.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
Social Bookmarking
 Add to CiteULike   Add to Complore   Add to Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us   Add to Digg   Add to Reddit   Add to Technorati   Add to Twitter  
What's this?

Archaeology, Science-Based Archaeology and the Mediterranean Bronze Age Metals Trade

A. Bernard Knapp

Department of Archaeology, University of Glasgow

Archaeologists often seem either sceptical of science-based archaeology or baffled by its results. The underpinnings of science-based archaeology may conflict with social or behavioural factors unsuited to quantification and grouping procedures. Thus, the interaction between archaeologists and their science-based colleagues has been less profitable than it might have been. The main point I consider in this study, and exemplify by considering metals provenance studies in the Bronze Age Mediterranean, is the relevance and application of the stated aims of sciencebased archaeology to the contemporary discipline of archaeology. Whereas most practitioners today recognize that science-based archaeology has the potential to contribute positively to the resolution of problems stemming from our field's inadequate and incomplete data resource, I contend that science and scientific analyses alone cannot adjudicate between cultural possibilities. Rather they provide analytical data which are likely to be open-ended, subject to multiple social interpretations, and in need of evaluation by collaborating archaeologists using social theory.

Key Words: commodification of metals • Cyprus • lead isotope analysis • Mediterranean Bronze Age • metals trade • recycling • Sardinia • science-based archaeology • social theory

European Journal of Archaeology, Vol. 3, No. 1, 31-56 (2000)
DOI: 10.1177/146195710000300106


Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Complore Complore   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us   Add to Digg Digg   Add to Reddit Reddit   Add to Technorati Technorati   Add to Twitter Twitter    What's this?


This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
European Journal of ArchaeologyHome page
M. Pearce
Editorial
European Journal of Archaeology, August 1, 2002; 5(2): 145 - 146.
[PDF]


Home page
European Journal of ArchaeologyHome page
F. Begemann, S. Schmitt-Strecker, E. Pernicka, and F. L. Schiavo
Chemical Composition and Lead Isotopy of Copper and Bronze from Nuragic Sardinia
European Journal of Archaeology, April 1, 2001; 4(1): 43 - 85.
[Abstract] [PDF]


Home page
European Journal of ArchaeologyHome page
N. Gale
Archaeology, Science-Based Archaeology and the Mediterranean Bronze Age Metals Trade: A Contribution to the Debate
European Journal of Archaeology, April 1, 2001; 4(1): 113 - 130.
[Abstract] [PDF]


Home page
European Journal of ArchaeologyHome page
A. Ruiz-Taboada and I. Montero
The Pattern of Use of Stone and Copper in Central Spain During the Bronze Age
European Journal of Archaeology, December 1, 2000; 3(3): 350 - 369.
[Abstract] [PDF]